Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Can bladder endometriosis be hard to diagnose? A two-case report and literature review.

Xingchen Li, Hong Li

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingchen LiDepartment of Radiology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Radiology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Bladder endometriosis (BE) is an uncommon form of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). This report aims to present two cases of BE with markedly contrasting clinical histories and presentations to highlight diagnostic challenges and discuss management strategies. Methods: We describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical management (laparoscopic partial cystectomy), histopathological findings, and short-term follow-up of two young women diagnosed with BE. Relevant literature is reviewed to contextualize the findings. Results: Both patients were accurately diagnosed preoperatively via MRI and underwent successful laparoscopic partial cystectomy, with histopathology confirming BE. Postoperative management involved a sequential protocol of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) followed by dienogest, which resulted in favorable short-term results, with no recurrence noted during follow-up. Conclusion: Diagnosing BE is often straightforward when typical clinical and imaging findings align. However, diagnostic delays are common due to the condition's rarity and symptom overlap. Early diagnosis is crucial for achieving better outcomes. For women of reproductive age experiencing recurrent pelvic symptoms, even atypical ones, early pelvic imaging examinations are recommended. MRI plays a key role in diagnosing BE, guiding treatment decisions, and assisting with differential diagnosis. Enhancing awareness of BE among clinicians and radiologists is essential to expedite diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

bladder endometriosiscase reportdeep infiltrating endometriosispartial cystectomypelvic MRI

Identifiers

PMID40978744
PMCPMC12443786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.