ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Can bladder endometriosis be hard to diagnose? A two-case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bladder Endometriosis as Part of Complex Pelvic Deep Endometriosis: Surgical Challenges and Outcomes in a Reference Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Bladder endometriosis (BE) is an uncommon form of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). This report aims to present two cases of BE with markedly contrasting clinical histories and presentations to highlight diagnostic challenges and discuss management strategies. Methods: We describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical management (laparoscopic partial cystectomy), histopathological findings, and short-term follow-up of two young women diagnosed with BE. Relevant literature is reviewed to contextualize the findings. Results: Both patients were accurately diagnosed preoperatively via MRI and underwent successful laparoscopic partial cystectomy, with histopathology confirming BE. Postoperative management involved a sequential protocol of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) followed by dienogest, which resulted in favorable short-term results, with no recurrence noted during follow-up. Conclusion: Diagnosing BE is often straightforward when typical clinical and imaging findings align. However, diagnostic delays are common due to the condition's rarity and symptom overlap. Early diagnosis is crucial for achieving better outcomes. For women of reproductive age experiencing recurrent pelvic symptoms, even atypical ones, early pelvic imaging examinations are recommended. MRI plays a key role in diagnosing BE, guiding treatment decisions, and assisting with differential diagnosis. Enhancing awareness of BE among clinicians and radiologists is essential to expedite diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.