ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Virtual reality-assisted pulmonary rehabilitation enhances early lung function recovery after thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients: a non-concurrent controlled study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prehabilitation-enhanced nomogram for predicting early pulmonary recovery failure after lung tumor surgery: development and multicenter validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation compliance among patients with lung cancer: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation health education and respiratory function training based on virtual reality (VR) technology in promoting early postoperative pulmonary function recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. Methods: A single-center, non-concurrent, pre-post controlled study was conducted. Ninety-five patients who underwent thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer between June 2023 and February 2024 were assigned to the control group and received routine postoperative respiratory function education. Another 95 patients admitted between March and December 2024 were assigned to the intervention group and received VR-based health education combined with training guidance. The intervention lasted for 3 days. Outcomes compared between groups included pulmonary function recovery, time to extubation, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, satisfaction with health education, and safety of the intervention. Results: The compliance rate in the intervention group was 94.74%, significantly higher than that in the control group (85.26%) ( Conclusion: VR-based health education combined with postoperative respiratory function training effectively improves patient compliance, promotes early pulmonary function recovery, shortens extubation time, and enhances patient satisfaction. It is clinically safe and feasible and holds promise for broader application in postoperative nursing care for lung cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.