Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978739›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Advances in intelligent recognition and diagnosis of skin scar images: concepts, methods, challenges, and future trends.

Fuhua Hu, Yuan Shao, Junjie Liu, Jialong Liu, Xiaolong Xiao, Kaibing Shi, Yangzong Zheng, Jianfeng Zhang, Xuelian Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fuhua Hu *Hangzhou Plastic Surgery Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of the College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan Shao *College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Junjie LiuCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Jialong LiuCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolong XiaoCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Kaibing ShiCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Yangzong ZhengCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Jianfeng ZhangCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Xuelian WangHangzhou Plastic Surgery Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of the College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin scars, resulting from the natural healing cascade following cutaneous injury, impose enduring physiological and psychological burdens on patients. This review first summarizes the biological classification of scars, their formation mechanisms, and conventional clinical assessment techniques. We then introduce core concepts of artificial intelligence, contrasting traditional machine learning algorithms with modern deep learning architectures, and review publicly available dermatology datasets. Standardized quantitative evaluation metrics and benchmarking protocols are presented to enable fair comparisons across studies. In the Methods Review section, we employ a systematic literature search strategy. Traditional machine learning methods are classified into unsupervised and supervised approaches. We examine convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as an independent category. We also explore advanced algorithms, including multimodal fusion, attention mechanisms, and self-supervised and generative models. For each category, we outline the technical approach, emphasize performance benefits, and discuss inherent limitations. Throughout, we also highlight key challenges related to data scarcity, domain shifts, and privacy legislation, and propose recommendations to enhance robustness, generalizability, and clinical interpretability. By aligning current capabilities with unmet clinical needs, this review offers a coherent roadmap for future research and the translational deployment of intelligent scar diagnosis systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in dermatologycomputer vision for skin analysisdatasetlarge-scale foundation modelmedical image process

Identifiers

PMID40978739
PMCPMC12443574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.