ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block for pain control in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine versus no regional analgesia after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.JTCVS open · 2026Trial
- Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone for Rhomboid Intercostal and Sub-Serratus Block in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Trial
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Efficacy of nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Peripheral Nerve Block Following Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Liposomal bupivacaine in thoracic surgery: a comprehensive review of current evidence and clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The impact of liposomal bupivacaine erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and early functional recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Acute postoperative pain management after cardiothoracic surgery: a bibliometric analysis and future directions.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus conventional bupivacaine hydrochloride for intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery. Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Setting: The study was conducted in the operating room, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and general ward. Participants: A total of 100 patients classified as ASA physical status II-III who were scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to receive either LB or conventional bupivacaine hydrochloride via intercostal nerve block, performed under ultrasound guidance. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) without a continuous background infusion. Rescue morphine was administered as needed if the PCA failed to provide adequate pain relief (VAS ≥ 4). Measurements: The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10) both at rest and during exercise at 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included total morphine consumption, PCA demand frequency, patient satisfaction scores, intraoperative remifentanil dose, and length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, pulmonary complications, and cardiovascular events. Results: Baseline characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between groups. Compared with conventional bupivacaine, the LB group showed significantly lower VAS scores at rest and during exercise at all six postoperative time points (6-72 h; all Conclusion: LB provided sustained and effective postoperative analgesia for 72 h after thoracoscopic surgery, while significantly reducing opioid consumption ( Clinical trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2300076708.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.