Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block for pain control in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Yuqing Chi, Xiaoqun Su, Shuxian Liu, Junhua Wen, Maoyan Hu, Haonan Li, Hualing Huang, Zhijing Zhang, Haihui Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuqing Chi *Shenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoqun Su *Shenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Shuxian Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Dongguan, China.
Junhua WenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Dongguan, China.
Maoyan HuDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Dongguan, China.
Haonan LiShenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Hualing HuangShenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhijing ZhangShenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Haihui XieShenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus conventional bupivacaine hydrochloride for intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery. Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Setting: The study was conducted in the operating room, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and general ward. Participants: A total of 100 patients classified as ASA physical status II-III who were scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to receive either LB or conventional bupivacaine hydrochloride via intercostal nerve block, performed under ultrasound guidance. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) without a continuous background infusion. Rescue morphine was administered as needed if the PCA failed to provide adequate pain relief (VAS ≥ 4). Measurements: The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10) both at rest and during exercise at 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included total morphine consumption, PCA demand frequency, patient satisfaction scores, intraoperative remifentanil dose, and length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, pulmonary complications, and cardiovascular events. Results: Baseline characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between groups. Compared with conventional bupivacaine, the LB group showed significantly lower VAS scores at rest and during exercise at all six postoperative time points (6-72 h; all Conclusion: LB provided sustained and effective postoperative analgesia for 72 h after thoracoscopic surgery, while significantly reducing opioid consumption ( Clinical trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2300076708.

Indexed as

bupivacaine hydrochlorideintercostal nerve blockliposomal bupivacainepostoperative analgesiathoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40978738
PMCPMC12443838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.