Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978730›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Laparoscopic enucleation: a safe and feasible treatment option for large (≥4 cm) benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors.

Chengqing Li, Yichen Yu, Wenyi Guo, Jiahao Wu, Jianwei Xu, Benzun Wei, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chengqing Li *Department of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yichen Yu *Department of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wenyi GuoDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiahao WuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jianwei XuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Benzun WeiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical approach for large benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors is controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic enucleation (LapEN) for large pancreatic tumors (≥4 cm). Methods: Patients who met the inclusion criteria at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2015 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. First, the safety and feasibility of LapEN procedure were evaluated based on tumor diameter (≥4 cm or not). And then, we further compared the efficacy between LapEN and standard pancreatectomy [laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD)/ laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP)] in patients with large tumors (≥4 cm). Results: Compared with patients with small tumors who underwent LapEN, there was no significant difference in rates of perioperative adverse events and postoperative complications in patients with large tumors who underwent LapEN, only postoperative hospital stays were prolonged. Among patients with large pancreatic tumors, comparison with standard pancreatectomy, LapEN achieved shorter operative time [(LapEN vs. LPD: 160.0 ± 41.4vs 396.8 ± 92.4 min, Conclusion: LapEN is a safe and feasible treatment option for large benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors.

Indexed as

laparoscopic enucleationorgan-sparing procedurepancreatic fistulapancreatic tumorpostoperative complicationstumor size

Identifiers

PMID40978730
PMCPMC12443777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.