Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978721›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

What should patients learn? Co-designing patient education to improve medication safety, professional-patient communication, and partnership.

Z Noah Hendrix, Fatoumata Jallow, Kimberly G Fulda, Richard A Young, Anna M Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Annesha White, Yan Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Z Noah HendrixCollege of Architecture, Planning, and Public Affairs, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Fatoumata JallowCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Kimberly G FuldaNorth Texas Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network (NorTex), Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Richard A YoungFamily Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Anna M EspinozaNorth Texas Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network (NorTex), Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Ayse P GursesArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Annesha WhiteCollege of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Yan XiaoCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS027277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse drug events are a major focus of patient safety research, but work is often limited to healthcare professionals' actions and inpatient populations. The patient work system provides a framework to understand the work done by patients and other nonprofessionals. The authors aimed to improve medication safety through the development of short educational videos designed to facilitate professional-patient partnership and shared decision-making by addressing the knowledge gaps and information asymmetry that serve as barriers to productive primary care encounters. Methods: The authors first performed a narrative review to identify knowledge gaps and the most important medication management principles for patients to learn. Next, the authors conducted participatory design workshops with professionals and patients to develop a list of topics for the educational videos. Lastly, the authors surveyed professionals ( Results: The narrative review identified two themes: (1) knowledge-based barriers and hazards, and (2) opportunities for education-based solutions. The design workshops resulted in a proposed list of 12 educational videos divided into four modules: ownership, partnership, system, and learning. Two-factor ANOVA testing of the survey results showed that there was a significant difference in interest with professionals being more interested than patients ( Discussion: Information asymmetry provides a framework to understand why some patients defer decision-making to professionals while also showing the greatest interest in the partnership module. It also highlights why it is important for professionals to tell patients about their desire for patient ownership of care-engaged patients provide better information to professionals, who might otherwise work with incomplete records. To improve medication safety, patient education efforts should include a focus on how patients can partner with HCPs and be mindful of the work system barriers that patients will encounter while performing the educational work. Successful efforts stand to improve patient outcomes by reducing information asymmetry and enabling shared decision-making.

Indexed as

co-designcommunicationinformation asymmetrymedication safetypartnershippatient educationpatient work systemshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40978721
PMCPMC12447905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.