ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
What should patients learn? Co-designing patient education to improve medication safety, professional-patient communication, and partnership.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "CARING in Action": A Knowledge Mobilization Project on Co-Creating Evidence-Based Communication Training in Chronic Pain Care for Healthcare Professionals.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Adverse drug events are a major focus of patient safety research, but work is often limited to healthcare professionals' actions and inpatient populations. The patient work system provides a framework to understand the work done by patients and other nonprofessionals. The authors aimed to improve medication safety through the development of short educational videos designed to facilitate professional-patient partnership and shared decision-making by addressing the knowledge gaps and information asymmetry that serve as barriers to productive primary care encounters. Methods: The authors first performed a narrative review to identify knowledge gaps and the most important medication management principles for patients to learn. Next, the authors conducted participatory design workshops with professionals and patients to develop a list of topics for the educational videos. Lastly, the authors surveyed professionals ( Results: The narrative review identified two themes: (1) knowledge-based barriers and hazards, and (2) opportunities for education-based solutions. The design workshops resulted in a proposed list of 12 educational videos divided into four modules: ownership, partnership, system, and learning. Two-factor ANOVA testing of the survey results showed that there was a significant difference in interest with professionals being more interested than patients ( Discussion: Information asymmetry provides a framework to understand why some patients defer decision-making to professionals while also showing the greatest interest in the partnership module. It also highlights why it is important for professionals to tell patients about their desire for patient ownership of care-engaged patients provide better information to professionals, who might otherwise work with incomplete records. To improve medication safety, patient education efforts should include a focus on how patients can partner with HCPs and be mindful of the work system barriers that patients will encounter while performing the educational work. Successful efforts stand to improve patient outcomes by reducing information asymmetry and enabling shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.