Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978719›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Evaluating the safety and efficiency of day-care hysterectomy: a comparative study using propensity score matching.

Qinyan Cao, Tianjiao Liu, Yunyi Su, Xian Wu, Aijie Xie, Hui Wang, Ying Liu, Jie Yu, Tenglan Wu, Xiaoyan Liao and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Qinyan Cao *Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Tianjiao Liu *Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yunyi Su *Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xian Wu *Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Aijie XieChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hui WangChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ying LiuChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jie YuChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Tenglan WuChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoyan LiaoChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Wei ChengChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jianmei LiaoChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qiang ZhangChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yonghong LinChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Li HeChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoqin GanChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of hysterectomy performed via traditional inpatient procedure versus day-care procedure with a focus on surgical time, post-operative recovery, costs, and patient satisfaction, using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounding variables. Methods: A total of 519 patients undergoing hysterectomy were initially identified. After PSM, 340 patients were included for analysis. Primary outcomes included perioperative complications, surgical time, post-operative discomfort, hospital stay, total cost, and patient satisfaction. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with operative bleeding and surgical time. Binary logistic regression was employed to analyze the factors influencing postoperative discomfort. Results: After PSM, the day-care group demonstrated significantly lower hemoglobin decline, post-operative discomfort rates, hospital stay, and total cost, along with higher patient satisfaction ( Conclusion: The day-care procedure, guided by an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, not only reduces hospital stay and overall costs but also improves patient satisfaction and reduces post-operative complications without compromising safety. These findings support the feasibility and benefits of day-care hysterectomy as a viable option for appropriately selected patients, offering significant advantages in terms of recovery and cost-efficiency.

Indexed as

day-care procedureenhanced recovery after surgeryhysterectomypropensity score matchingsurgical outcomestraditional inpatient procedure

Identifiers

PMID40978719
PMCPMC12446359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.