ArticlePain reports2025
Pain medication associated with decreased physical performance and rehabilitation progress.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The effects of pain medication on physical performance in chronic pain are poorly understood. We examined the association between analgesics and physical performance in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) requiring rehabilitation. Methods: We classified participants into 3 categories according to the highest level of medication used at admission for rehabilitation: no analgesics (NAs), nonopioid analgesics (NOAs), and opioid analgesics (OPAs). We measured performance with functional tests (6-minute walk test [6MWT], progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation [PILE], steep ramp test, handgrip strength test [HST], 5 times sit-to-stand test, and 1-minute stair-climbing test [1MSCT]) at admission and discharge. Multiple regression models were used to assess the differences in functional capacity between the 3 groups, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: We included 4,339 individuals; 1,731 took no analgesics (40%), 1,742 took NOAs (40%), and 866 took OPAs (20%). The median consumption was 11.7 mg per day according to morphine-equivalent dose calculation. Physical performance was poorer for patients taking than those not taking analgesics in all tests examined. We found a negative gradient in performance with increasing WHO analgesic ladder. The odds of achieving clinically significant improvements in 4 tests (6MWT, PILE, HST affected side, and 1MSCT) was reduced for people taking opioids compared with the NA group. Conclusion: Given the inconclusive and limited evidence for the benefit of analgesics on pain and disability in CMSP, health professionals should be aware of these results for even low doses of opioids, which were associated with poor physical performance and rehabilitation progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.