Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978716›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Pain medication associated with decreased physical performance and rehabilitation progress.

Lara Mendes Fernandes, Philippe Vuistiner, Cyrille Burrus, Michel Konzelmann, Bertrand Léger, Marie Besson, François Luthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lara Mendes FernandesDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-7214
Philippe VuistinerDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-4970
Cyrille BurrusDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-8085
Michel KonzelmannDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9842-7808
Bertrand LégerDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-1442
Marie BessonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-4467
François LuthiDepartment of Medical Research Suva clinics, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-1523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of pain medication on physical performance in chronic pain are poorly understood. We examined the association between analgesics and physical performance in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) requiring rehabilitation. Methods: We classified participants into 3 categories according to the highest level of medication used at admission for rehabilitation: no analgesics (NAs), nonopioid analgesics (NOAs), and opioid analgesics (OPAs). We measured performance with functional tests (6-minute walk test [6MWT], progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation [PILE], steep ramp test, handgrip strength test [HST], 5 times sit-to-stand test, and 1-minute stair-climbing test [1MSCT]) at admission and discharge. Multiple regression models were used to assess the differences in functional capacity between the 3 groups, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: We included 4,339 individuals; 1,731 took no analgesics (40%), 1,742 took NOAs (40%), and 866 took OPAs (20%). The median consumption was 11.7 mg per day according to morphine-equivalent dose calculation. Physical performance was poorer for patients taking than those not taking analgesics in all tests examined. We found a negative gradient in performance with increasing WHO analgesic ladder. The odds of achieving clinically significant improvements in 4 tests (6MWT, PILE, HST affected side, and 1MSCT) was reduced for people taking opioids compared with the NA group. Conclusion: Given the inconclusive and limited evidence for the benefit of analgesics on pain and disability in CMSP, health professionals should be aware of these results for even low doses of opioids, which were associated with poor physical performance and rehabilitation progress.

Indexed as

1-minute stair-climbing test5 times sit-to-stand test6-minute walk testAnalgesicsChronic musculoskeletal painFunctionFunctional performanceHandgrip strength testOpioidsPain medicationPhysical activityPhysical performance measuresProgressive isoinertial lifting evaluationRehabilitationSteep ramp test

Identifiers

PMID40978716
PMCPMC12448160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.