ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Mid-term (30- to 90-day) neurological changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective study (the JAAM-OHCA registry).
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroprognostication After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: ECMO-Specific Challenges and a Multimodal Time-Sensitive Framework.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have examined mid-term neurological changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study aimed to evaluate neurological improvements between 30 and 90 days in OHCA patients treated with ECPR or conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) using a large nationwide cohort. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study used data from a Japanese nationwide OHCA registry. Participants were categorized into ECPR and CCPR groups based on the initial resuscitation method. Neurological changes between 30 and 90 days were assessed using Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scores. The primary outcome was neurological improvement, defined as an improvement in CPC score during this period. Results: A total of 4467 OHCA survivors at 30 days were included, 669 in the ECPR group and 3798 in the CCPR group. At 30 days, favorable neurological outcomes were observed in 318 ECPR patients (47.5 %) and 2103 CCPR patients (55.4 %). Neurological improvement between 30 and 90 days was more frequent in the ECPR group (83 [12.4 %] vs. 258 [6.7 %]). There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the two groups (82 [12.2 %] vs. 519 [13.6 %]). ECPR was independently associated with 30- to 90-day neurological improvement (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.38-2.93) but was not associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.11; 95 % CI, 0.77-1.59). Conclusion: ECPR was associated with a greater likelihood of neurological improvement between 30 and 90 days. By 90 days, mortality was nearly the same in both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.