Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978708›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2025

Mid-term (30- to 90-day) neurological changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective study (the JAAM-OHCA registry).

Takashi Hongo, Tetsuya Yumoto, Tsuyoshi Nojima, Takafumi Obara, Yoshiyuki Ueda, Takashi Yorifuji, Atsunori Nakao, Hiromichi Naito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takashi HongoOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Tetsuya YumotoOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Tsuyoshi NojimaOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Takafumi ObaraOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Yoshiyuki UedaOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Takashi YorifujiOkayama University, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Atsunori NakaoOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Hiromichi NaitoOkayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined mid-term neurological changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study aimed to evaluate neurological improvements between 30 and 90 days in OHCA patients treated with ECPR or conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) using a large nationwide cohort. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study used data from a Japanese nationwide OHCA registry. Participants were categorized into ECPR and CCPR groups based on the initial resuscitation method. Neurological changes between 30 and 90 days were assessed using Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scores. The primary outcome was neurological improvement, defined as an improvement in CPC score during this period. Results: A total of 4467 OHCA survivors at 30 days were included, 669 in the ECPR group and 3798 in the CCPR group. At 30 days, favorable neurological outcomes were observed in 318 ECPR patients (47.5 %) and 2103 CCPR patients (55.4 %). Neurological improvement between 30 and 90 days was more frequent in the ECPR group (83 [12.4 %] vs. 258 [6.7 %]). There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the two groups (82 [12.2 %] vs. 519 [13.6 %]). ECPR was independently associated with 30- to 90-day neurological improvement (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.38-2.93) but was not associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.11; 95 % CI, 0.77-1.59). Conclusion: ECPR was associated with a greater likelihood of neurological improvement between 30 and 90 days. By 90 days, mortality was nearly the same in both groups.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestECPRPatient outcome assessmentPost-cardiac arrest syndromePrognosticationVenoarterial ECMO

Identifiers

PMID40978708
PMCPMC12447216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.