ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Aerial Logistics for Maternal and Newborn Health: A Simulation-Based Analysis Grounded in Real-World Evidence from the Ashanti Region in Ghana.
Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current and potential uses of drones in healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review.Global health action · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, low antenatal care (ANC) coverage and limited access to facility-based deliveries remain key drivers of adverse maternal and newborn health (MNH) outcomes. Inadequate service provision at health facilities and insufficient care-seeking behavior are exacerbated by supply chain inefficiencies that restrict access to essential maternal health commodities. Aerial logistics (centralized storage and drone delivery) has shown promise as a novel approach to addressing these logistical challenges and supporting maternal health service delivery, but its cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. Objectives: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of aerial logistics as an intervention for MNH. It builds on previously observed programmatic effects (increases in ANC visits, facility-based deliveries, and reductions in maternal mortality in Ghana's Ashanti Region) to model downstream health outcomes and estimate incremental economic value. Methods: Using microsimulation and published epidemiological parameters, the study models additional health outcomes resulting from increased service utilization among 11 249 pregnant women, including reductions in low birth weight, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal mortality, and early-onset neonatal sepsis. Alongside the observed maternal mortality reduction, all outcomes are translated into life-years saved and discounted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted. Cost estimates are based on real-world aerial logistics operations and national data on health system expenditures and household out-of-pocket costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are calculated from both health system and societal perspectives. Uncertainty is addressed through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The intervention averted 3754.99 discounted DALYs at a net cost of US Discussion: Aerial logistics yields substantial health and economic gains, derived from previously documented increases in service utilization, and ranks among the most cost-effective documented MNH interventions. Conclusions: Aerial logistics is a highly cost-effective, scalable strategy to improve maternal and newborn health in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.