ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Building digital resilience: leading healthcare transformation through an online community.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From emergence to recoverability: a sociotechnical control trajectory theory of HIT-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Digital Transformational Leadership and Coordinated Care in European Primary Healthcare: The Mediating Role of Patient Agility.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- Why health information technology safety problems remain invisible.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Why digital health fails silently: a sociotechnical theory of health information technology-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Telemedicine in polish primary care during and after the COVID-19 crisis: a retrospective analysis of over 720,000 consultations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare systems globally face systemic vulnerabilities, such as crisis response, insufficient capacity, lack of integration, and rising care costs while simultaneously being pressured to accelerate the shift toward digital health solutions. In response, new organizational forms and digitally enabled collaborations have emerged to support care continuity and innovation. This study examines how digital resilience can be built at a system level through a national online community of healthcare professionals. Drawing on a longitudinal qualitative case study of Israel's Digital Health Community, an initiative launched by the Ministry of Health in 2020 in response to COVID-19 crisis, we explore how a digitally mediated, cross-sectoral online community with more than 1,200 medical professionals from various disciplines and organizations enabled national healthcare transformation through digital resilience. Methods: Using interviews, observations, and digital document analysis conducted over four years, we trace how the online community enabled systemic resilience through three interconnected dynamics: the redefinition of roles and responsibilities across disciplines, enhanced collaboration across organizations and governance levels, and the development of a culture of innovation. Results: By challenging existing norms, the online community facilitated an entrepreneurship approach, fostering leadership in healthcare transformation and overcoming professional resistance to change. These interactions helped generate integrated models of care, informed national digital health regulation, and enabled rapid experimentation in service design and delivery. We argue that digital resilience plays an important role in enabling these healthcare transformations. Discussion: We present a conceptual model that illustrates how digital resilience is produced not as a fixed organizational trait, but as an emergent, multi-level outcome of structured community engagement. It highlights the need for new governance models that merge top-down and bottom-up involvement and leadership, moving from hierarchical to network structures to diffuse innovation and transformation among diverse stakeholders across the healthcare ecosystem. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to the growing literature on digital health transformation by highlighting the role of participatory, networked approaches to resilience-building. The study offers actionable insights for policymakers and health system leaders seeking to institutionalize adaptive capacity through digitally enabled collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.