Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978660›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Instrumentation timing for manual K file and different pedatric rotary files systems in deciduous mandibular molars.

Vikram Jhamb, Ameer Akhil Ahmed Shaik, Priyanka Vinay Agrawal, Shamolie Shailesh Deshmukh, Indu Kumari, Harish Kumar, Hasina Khan, Pratik Surana

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vikram JhambDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Science, Amargadh, Gujarat, India.
Ameer Akhil Ahmed ShaikBachelor of Dental Surgery, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.
Priyanka Vinay AgrawalBDS, Jodhpur Dental College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Shamolie Shailesh DeshmukhIntern, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University's Dental College & Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra - 411043, India.
Indu KumariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vananchal Dental College & Hospital, Garhwa, Jharkhand, India.
Harish KumarDepartment of Oral Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha - 751024, India.
Hasina KhanConsultant Pediatric and Preventive Dentist, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pratik SuranaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulpectomy has been the standard treatment for necrotic primary teeth. However, hand files often results in longer chairside times. Pediatric rotary files made especially for primary teeth have been made possible by technological advancements, improving the effectiveness of pulpectomy. Therefore, it is of interest to compare instrumentation timing between Hand K files and pediatric rotary files (Prime Pedo

Indexed as

hand instrumentationinstrumentation timePulpectomyrotary files

Identifiers

PMID40978660
PMCPMC12449555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.