ArticleBioinformation2025
Health belief model based predictors and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination amongst frontline health workers.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic presented with a scenario wherein the healthcare delivery system was overwhelmed by unprecedented COVID morbidities. Vaccines were made available in a short span of time during the pandemic for the public that required the frontline workers especially the ASHAs to overcome their own hesitancies of the newer vaccine before convincing the community for vaccination. A cross-sectional survey on the perceptions of COVID vaccination was conducted wherein 74 ASHAs participated in the interview involving Likert scale responses on vaccine acceptance which were modelled on Health Belief Model (HBM) to find predictors of vaccine acceptance by performing ordinal regression analysis. It was seen that the domains of 'Benefit', 'Barrier' and 'Modifying Variable' appeared to increase the acceptance of the vaccine whereas the domains of 'Susceptibility' and 'Severity' had decreasing effect on acceptance, of which only 'Severity' domain significantly had a negative effect on COVID vaccine acceptance amongst the frontline workers. HBM is a useful tool which can provide information about the facilitating and negating factors of newer vaccines introduction which can be utilized by public health researchers to better understand the perceptions and accordingly vaccine introduction approaches can be modified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.