ArticlePEC innovation2025
Hidden misinformation in YouTube short videos on syphilis: A mixed-methods study.
Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Communication features of ChatGPT responses and care-seeking intention for syphilis in Japan: a controlled dialogue experiment.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: YouTube short videos constitute a key informational resource for individuals at high risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We conducted a quality assessment of short videos about syphilis intended for the general public in Japan. Methods: In October 2024, a comprehensive sample of YouTube short videos on syphilis was retrieved using keywords frequently used to search for information on the disease. mDISCERN criteria were employed to assess the reliability of the information in the 72 videos selected for analysis. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to qualitatively examine misinformation embedded within the videos. Results: The mean mDISCERN score of the videos was 2.0 (SD 0.9) and 80 % of the videos did not meet the reliability criteria. One in five videos potentially hindered audience engagement in health behaviors by inducing fear of the disease, reinforcing stigma and insensitivity toward high-risk individuals, and punitively portraying those infected. Some of these messages originated from healthcare professionals, indicating their potential role in reinforcing such biases. Conclusion: YouTube short videos can support syphilis awareness and prevention, but difficulties with information reliability and lack of quality are common. Stigmatizing content may hinder health-seeking behaviors. Enhancing the quality and sensitivity of messages, particularly those from healthcare professionals, is essential to maximize their public health impact. Innovation: This study is among the first to analyze YouTube short videos about STIs, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to assess misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.