ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Acupuncture-Combined Therapies in the Treatment of Sciatica Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of CT-Verified Deep Needling at the Foramen Acupoint for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Trial
- Comment on "Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Acupuncture-Combined Therapies in the Treatment of Sciatica Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sciatica is a common complication of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of acupuncture monotherapies, acupuncture versus conventional rehabilitation, and acupuncture monotherapy versus combination therapies for LDH-related sciatica. Patients and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio and GEMTC. STATA generated network and funnel plots. Treatment rankings were assessed using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Bias risk was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Results: According to SUCRA, in terms of total effective rate, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 92.93%); in terms of VAS, the better intervention was needle knife combined with rehabilitation therapy (NK+RT, 95.96%); in terms of ODI, the more effective intervention was electroacupuncture combined with cupping therapy (EA+Cupping, 98.03%); in terms of JOA, the best intervention was electrostimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy (ES+RT, 88.27%); in terms of IL-6 and TNF-α, the better intervention was electroacupuncture combined with electrostimulation (EA+ES, 99.99%). Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with other therapies demonstrates superior efficacy compared to rehabilitation treatment. Specifically, NK+RT is possibly a more effective intervention for pain relief; EA+Cupping shows a better benefit in improving disability and quality of life; ES+RT is likely a more effective strategy for promoting neurological recovery; and EA+ES is possibly better in reducing inflammatory responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.