ReviewJournal of pain research2025
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analgesic and Functional Outcomes of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Quadratus Lumborum Block After Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain research & management · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anaesthesia technique for acute pain management that is becoming frequently employed for emergency lower limb fractures, particularly hip injuries. While current evidence has been predominantly derived from postoperative randomized trials and case series, the results of recent clinical reports support the preprocedural utility of the PENG block in emergency settings for rapid analgesia 40-60% pain score reduction and preservation of motor function. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights and clinical outcomes from the literature, comparing the targeted sensory blockade of the hip capsule with the PENG block with that of systemic opioids (which risks inducing respiratory depression) and fascia iliaca block (which can induce motor impairment). Key advantages of PENG blockade include significant opioid-sparing effects (50-70% reduction morphine use) and almost no motor complications. Standardized ultrasound-guided protocols can address challenges related to anatomical variability. Preliminary evidence from case reports suggests that the efficacy of the PENG block to pelvic and femoral shaft fractures, although multicentre trials are needed to establish optimal doses and long-term functional outcomes. This evidence indicates that PENG blockade could serve as a promising emergency intervention, but further protocol refinement is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.