ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Large language models in orthopedics: An exploratory research trend analysis and machine learning classification.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Performance of Large Language Models for Orthopedic-Related Rare Diseases and Their Impact on Physicians' Diagnostic Accuracy: 2-Stage Comparative Evaluation Study Based on the Chinese Rare Disease Catalog.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopaedic surgery.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026Review
- Large language models in sports injury care: a comparative expert evaluation of GPT-4o and GPT-5.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A comparative study of four large language models in treatment decision-making for Hip impingement syndrome based on real-world data.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in shoulder and elbow surgery: a bibliometric analysis of affiliation-based collaboration patterns.JSES international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) are set to transform orthopedic practice with promising applications and a growing body of research. This exploratory study analyzed research trends in orthopedic LLMs and validated a machine learning classifier for categorizing publications into predefined domains. We hypothesized that LLM-related research would exhibit distinct thematic trends, and that a machine learning classifier would be able to accurately categorize research domains. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of 140 Scopus-indexed publications (2019-2024) was performed using keyword co-occurrence and thematic clustering. Articles were categorized into five areas: Patient Education, Research and Ethics, Surgeon Education, Clinical Support, and Diagnostics and Radiology Interpretation. Machine learning classifiers were trained on TF-IDF vectorized text and evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Exploratory projections using linear regression assessed the volume and growth trends within the five research areas. Results: The exploratory analysis revealed a substantial increase in LLM publications increased significantly from 28 in 2023 to 108 articles in 2024. The support vector machine (SVM) model outperformed others, achieving 82 % accuracy (AUC-ROC: 0.97), with high precision for categorizing research in Clinical Assistance Tools and strong recall for Diagnosis and Radiology Interpretation. Subgroup analysis showed that Patient Education achieved balanced performance (precision: 88 %, recall: 78 %, F1-score: 82 %), but overlapping terminology caused misclassifications between research and education domains. Temporal analysis predicted continued growth in these research domains, with Patient Education (+26 %) and Research and Ethics (+57 %) leading the way through 2027. Conclusion: LLMs are exploring advancements in patient engagement, surgeon training, and orthopedic research, but challenges in reliability and ethics require careful implementation. Future work should focus on real-world validation, specialty-specific applications, and integrating multimodal AI systems. The SVM classifier demonstrated robust capabilities, providing a valuable tool for navigating the growing body of literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.