Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978518›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025

Large language models in orthopedics: An exploratory research trend analysis and machine learning classification.

Ausberto Velasquez Garcia, Masataka Minami, Manuel Mejia-Rodríguez, Jorge Rolando Ortíz-Morales, Fernando Radice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ausberto Velasquez GarciaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Masataka MinamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Manuel Mejia-RodríguezSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Jorge Rolando Ortíz-MoralesDepartamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fernando RadiceClínica Universidad de los Andes, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) are set to transform orthopedic practice with promising applications and a growing body of research. This exploratory study analyzed research trends in orthopedic LLMs and validated a machine learning classifier for categorizing publications into predefined domains. We hypothesized that LLM-related research would exhibit distinct thematic trends, and that a machine learning classifier would be able to accurately categorize research domains. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of 140 Scopus-indexed publications (2019-2024) was performed using keyword co-occurrence and thematic clustering. Articles were categorized into five areas: Patient Education, Research and Ethics, Surgeon Education, Clinical Support, and Diagnostics and Radiology Interpretation. Machine learning classifiers were trained on TF-IDF vectorized text and evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Exploratory projections using linear regression assessed the volume and growth trends within the five research areas. Results: The exploratory analysis revealed a substantial increase in LLM publications increased significantly from 28 in 2023 to 108 articles in 2024. The support vector machine (SVM) model outperformed others, achieving 82 % accuracy (AUC-ROC: 0.97), with high precision for categorizing research in Clinical Assistance Tools and strong recall for Diagnosis and Radiology Interpretation. Subgroup analysis showed that Patient Education achieved balanced performance (precision: 88 %, recall: 78 %, F1-score: 82 %), but overlapping terminology caused misclassifications between research and education domains. Temporal analysis predicted continued growth in these research domains, with Patient Education (+26 %) and Research and Ethics (+57 %) leading the way through 2027. Conclusion: LLMs are exploring advancements in patient engagement, surgeon training, and orthopedic research, but challenges in reliability and ethics require careful implementation. Future work should focus on real-world validation, specialty-specific applications, and integrating multimodal AI systems. The SVM classifier demonstrated robust capabilities, providing a valuable tool for navigating the growing body of literature.

Indexed as

Chat GPTLarge language models (LLMs)Machine learning classificationOrthopedic researchThematic clustering

Identifiers

PMID40978518
PMCPMC12446865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.