ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Biceps tenodesis in the setting of total shoulder arthroplasty: A matched cohort analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies have theorized that pain refractory to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in patients who did not undergo a concomitant biceps tenodesis or tenotomy may be as a result of the pathologic interaction between the long head of the biceps tendon and the humeral prosthesis. This study evaluates the effect of concomitant biceps tenodesis during aTSA on long-term clinical and radiographic patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent aTSA with or without biceps tenodesis from 2000 to 2017. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were collected. Patients in the biceps tenodesis group were matched with those who underwent aTSA without tenodesis based on age, follow-up interval, sex, and preoperative ASES score. Results: The study included 88 shoulders (44 tenodesis, 44 no tenodesis), with median follow-up of 9.9 years (range 3.3-19.0). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in postoperative forward elevation, external/internal rotation, VAS, ASES, or SST scores at most recent follow-up. There were no significant differences in pre-to postoperative improvement in ROM and patient-reported outcome scores. Both groups demonstrated excellent implant survival, with similar revision rates at nearly 10 years postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients who underwent aTSA with concomitant biceps tenodesis did not demonstrate inferior long-term clinical outcomes or pain scores in comparison to patients who underwent aTSA with preservation of the biceps tendon. Appropriately selected patients may experience equivalent, satisfactory outcomes after aTSA, independent of concomitant biceps tenodesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.