Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2025

Medication beliefs and adherence during and after pregnancy among women at risk for gestational hypertensive disorders.

Pauline Dreesen, Dorien Lanssens, Sandy Nouwen, Pauline Volders, Febe Janssen, Adelheid Soubry, Wilfried Gyselaers, Michael Ceulemans

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04031430 (PREMOM II), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04031430 nacompletednot on this map

PREMOM II: Pregnancy Remote Monitoring of Women with Gestational Hypertensive Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorHasselt UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled1,095ConditionsGestational HypertensionArmsTelemonitoring, Longitudinal CV profiling during pregnancy and before and after the start/switch of antihypertensive medication, CV profiling before and after the start/switch of antihypertensive medication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pauline DreesenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Dorien LanssensFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Sandy NouwenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Pauline VoldersFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Febe JanssenFuture Health, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Adelheid SoubryDepartment of Human Genetics, Epigenetic Epidemiology Lab, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wilfried GyselaersFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Michael CeulemansClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Low-dose aspirin initiated ≤16 weeks of gestation reduces the risk of developing early-onset preeclampsia. However, no recent data are available on women's beliefs about medication and adherence in pregnant women at risk for gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate medication beliefs and adherence in this high-risk population, and to explore the relationship between adherence, self-reported aspirin intake, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Methods: Pregnant women at risk for GHD followed up via remote blood pressure monitoring and who were prescribed aspirin 160 mg/day were included (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04031430). Women's beliefs about medication (in general and during pregnancy) and adherence were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) and the Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS) administered during pregnancy (at inclusion), at 10-21 days and 4-6 months postpartum. Aspirin intake was self-reported in the MediSafe app. We did not intervene throughout the study. Results: A total of 73 participants were recruited at a median gestational age of 14.1 weeks (IQR:13.2-15.6). The mean pregnancy BMQ scores for overuse and harm were 10.6 ± 2.9 and 8.8 ± 2.2 on a total score of 20, respectively. A total of 95% agreed to have a higher threshold for taking medicines during pregnancy and 50% disagreed with refraining from using medicines during pregnancy. Similar positive attitudes towards medicines were observed postpartum. The mean ProMAS score in pregnancy was 10.3 ± 3.9 out of 18. Similar rates were observed at 10-21 days postpartum, while a trend toward lower adherence was seen at 4-6 months postpartum (mean score 8.9 ± 4.5). The mean "minimal" and "maximal" self-reported aspirin intake was 82.5% and 98.6%, respectively. ProMAS scores were positively correlated with self-reported aspirin intake. Uncomplicated pregnancies showed higher ProMAS scores during pregnancy compared to complicated pregnancies. Discussion: Women at risk for GHD involved in a clinical trial showed positive beliefs about medication use in general and during pregnancy throughout the perinatal period and reported high aspirin adherence rates. However, more research is needed to provide real-world adherence estimates in pregnancy and to assess the predictive utility of the ProMAS instrument to forecast adherence throughout pregnancy and adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier NCT04031430.

Indexed as

adherenceaspirinbeliefsgestational hypertensionpreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID40978500
PMCPMC12443123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.