SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Drugs targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway in the treatment of patients with COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is categorized as group 3 PH and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Currently, there are no approved therapies for those who have PH secondary to COPD due to conflicting evidence. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence on the effectiveness of drugs targeting the nitric oxide (NO)-soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway on clinical outcomes among patients with COPD-associated PH. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus, from inception to 1 February 2024. Studies investigating the efficacy of drugs targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway on clinical outcomes in patients with COPD-associated PH were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed case reports, systematic reviews, review articles, conference abstracts with no full text, non-full-text articles, non-English manuscripts, opinion articles, and book chapters. Two distinct Cochrane risk-of-bias tools designed for randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were used to evaluate the risk of bias within the selected studies for inclusion. Results: Fourteen studies, comprising a total of 567 adult patients diagnosed with PH secondary to COPD, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Among these, nine studies reported significant improvements in clinical parameters related to pulmonary hemodynamics. Improvement in exercise capacity was observed in four out of seven studies. Three studies evaluated dyspnea severity and quality of life following treatment with agents targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway. Of these, three demonstrated improvement in dyspnea severity while two reported enhancements in health-related quality of life. Substantial heterogeneity was evident regarding the potential of pharmacological agents targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway to enhance gas exchange, lung function, and arterial oxygenation in COPD patients with concurrent PH. Conclusion: The short-term use of oral drugs targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway, particularly sildenafil, demonstrates promising potential for enhancing pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise capacity, dyspnea severity, and health-related quality of life but not lung function and oxygenation status in adult patients with COPD-associated PH. Further double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to assess the therapeutic benefits of agents targeting the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway, particularly inhaled therapies for managing PH due to COPD. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, CRD42023453503.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.