ArticleACS omega2025
Modeling Chelator Substituent Effects as Therapeutic Targets in Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explore disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that focus on the front-end pathology of widespread neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). From recent studies, a promising DMT route is chelation therapy, which addresses disease initiation by redox-active biometals within the central nervous system (CNS) that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promote peptide aggregation. This research focuses on density functional theory (DFT) studies of chelator candidates based on tetradentate Schiff bases and investigates the physicochemical properties that contribute to effective therapeutic capabilities. A property of high interest is the chelate selectivity of Cu-(II) vs Zn-(II) vis-à-vis binding to amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides in diseased tissues. Design modifications of chelator candidates allow for the identification of crucial factors in binding affinity, selectivity, etc. This study reveals that electronic factors are much more influential than steric effects across the diverse analogue library. The sensitivity of Cu-(II)/Zn-(II) selectivity to ring substituent effects is significant, specifically through the implementation of complementary electronic pairing between a directing group and a ring moiety directly involved in chelation. Electron-donating substituents on the phenol ring and electron-withdrawing substituents on the pyridine ring enhance the desired Cu-(II)-Schiff base selectivity toward the therapeutic target.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.