Review3 Biotech2025
Artificial intelligence in cancer care: revolutionizing diagnosis, treatment, and precision medicine amid emerging challenges and future opportunities.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Cancer Research Met Artificial Intelligence: From Machine Learning to Intelligent Oncology.Cancers · 2026Article
- AI-based tumor cellularity assessment in digital pathology: A review of methods, datasets, and clinical translation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Rationale and Methods of a Surveillance System for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Qualitative Participatory Action Research Approach in Middle-Income Countries-The Experience in Iran.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Nanobiosensors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Biomarkers: Advances and Clinical Translational Potential.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- AI-enhanced oncology MDT 2.0: from multi-modal data synergy to value-based care reconstruction - a systematic review of clinical efficacy and socioeconomic benefits.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: A Systematic Review from Nanomedicine to Neurology and Hepatology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in oncology to assist early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery. A systematic review is required to integrate evidence across various AI applications in cancer treatment. Systematically assess the use of AI applications in oncology, integrate study findings, highlight methodological issues, and set directions for future research. According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore between January 2013 and December 2024. Search terms integrated AI-related terms with oncology-related terms. Peer-reviewed original research studies with the use of AI on cancer care in human or human-derived datasets were the eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias with suitable tools. 120 out of 4852 records were included according to inclusion criteria. Applications fell into five clusters: imaging/radiomics, genomics/biomarker discovery, drug discovery/repurposing, clinical decision support, and patient monitoring. Convolutional neural networks were predominant in imaging tasks, whereas ML classifiers were prevalent in genomics. Most of the studies showed improved performance with respect to conventional methods although most of the studies failed to conduct multi-center validation. Heterogeneity of data, interpretability limitations, and integration problems were common issues. AI holds great potential along the cancer care continuum but is at risk of being threatened by issues with data quality, validation, interpretability, and translation to practice. Addressing these issues will require collaboration among disciplines, reporting to standardized guidelines, and large-scale validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.