Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978321›Full record

Review3 Biotech2025

Artificial intelligence in cancer care: revolutionizing diagnosis, treatment, and precision medicine amid emerging challenges and future opportunities.

Chandrabose Selvaraj, William C Cho, Kulanthaivel Langeswaran, Abdulaziz S Alothaim, Rajendran Vijayakumar, Mani Jayaprakashvel, Deepali Desai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chandrabose SelvarajCSRDD Lab, Bioinformatics Division, Department of Marine Biotechnology, AMET University (Deemed to Be University), East Coast Road, Kanathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603112 India.ORCID 0000-0002-8115-0486
William C ChoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Kulanthaivel LangeswaranDepartment of Biomedical Science, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, 630003 India.
Abdulaziz S AlothaimDepartment of Biology, College of Science in Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, 11952 Saudi Arabia.
Rajendran VijayakumarDepartment of Biology, College of Science in Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, 11952 Saudi Arabia.
Mani JayaprakashvelDepartment of Marine Biotechnology, AMET University (Deemed to Be University), East Coast Road, Kanathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603112 India.
Deepali DesaiDepartment of Microbiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Pimpri, Pune, 411018 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in oncology to assist early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and drug discovery. A systematic review is required to integrate evidence across various AI applications in cancer treatment. Systematically assess the use of AI applications in oncology, integrate study findings, highlight methodological issues, and set directions for future research. According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore between January 2013 and December 2024. Search terms integrated AI-related terms with oncology-related terms. Peer-reviewed original research studies with the use of AI on cancer care in human or human-derived datasets were the eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias with suitable tools. 120 out of 4852 records were included according to inclusion criteria. Applications fell into five clusters: imaging/radiomics, genomics/biomarker discovery, drug discovery/repurposing, clinical decision support, and patient monitoring. Convolutional neural networks were predominant in imaging tasks, whereas ML classifiers were prevalent in genomics. Most of the studies showed improved performance with respect to conventional methods although most of the studies failed to conduct multi-center validation. Heterogeneity of data, interpretability limitations, and integration problems were common issues. AI holds great potential along the cancer care continuum but is at risk of being threatened by issues with data quality, validation, interpretability, and translation to practice. Addressing these issues will require collaboration among disciplines, reporting to standardized guidelines, and large-scale validation studies.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiomarker discoveryCancer diagnosis and treatmentEthical and regulatory challengesMachine learningPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID40978321
PMCPMC12443665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.