ArticleHealth science reports2025
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer (Lynch Syndrome): An Emerging Public Health Concern.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Relationship betweenZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond Asbestos: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Revealing Lynch Syndrome Through Mismatch Repair Deficiency.Cureus · 2026Article
- Lynch syndrome withOpen life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes that confer increased lifetime risks for colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. Lynch syndrome accounts for only 3%-5% of colorectal cancer cases; however, most patients with Lynch syndrome are not diagnosed, leading to missed opportunities for enhanced surveillance and preventive interventions. Discussion: This study examined the molecular genetics, epidemiology, and shortcomings of conventional, selective screening strategies for Lynch syndrome. Universal tumor testing using MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) or microsatellite instability (MSI) analyses is recommended for all newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancers, with reflex BRAF/methylation testing applied to distinguish likely sporadic cases. We also need to consider essential components of coordinated Lynch syndrome management, including cascade screening of family members, electronic health record (EHR) integration, multidisciplinary care teams, and public education. Selective screening for Lynch syndrome, based on the age or family history, misses many cases, whereas universal tumor testing is more cost-effective for identifying more patients. In addition to genetic counseling, surveillance colonoscopy, prophylactic surgical measures, and psychosocial support, we must provide equitable access to these services for all potentially affected patients. Advances in technology, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays and polygenic risk scores, represent new methods for cancer screening and risk stratification. Conclusion: In summary, a coordinated, equity-centric public health model for Lynch syndrome should incorporate universal tumor testing, cascade screening, integration of clinical workflows, and community outreach. This framework could potentially turn the "underrecognized" aspect of Lynch syndrome into a "largely preventable" cancer syndrome. The proposed model could also represent a way to develop a broader strategy for other hereditary cancer syndromes, as future research focuses on scalable implementation, real-world cost-effectiveness, and genomic population screening.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.