ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Lupus retinopathy manifesting unilateral neovascular alterations: A case with 15 years of follow-up.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a rare case of lupus retinopathy, characterized by unilateral neovascular alterations and asymmetrical clinical progression. Observations: A 32-year-old woman diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was referred to the ophthalmology department with decreased and blurred vision in the right eye. The patient was diagnosed with SLE at 31 years of age owing to cutaneous lupus, oral ulcers, and arthritis with a positive antinuclear antibody. Initial fundus assessment showed bilateral cotton wool spots predominantly in the right retina, and fluorescein angiography revealed nonperfusion areas exclusively in the right retina. Therefore, bilateral lupus retinopathy was diagnosed. Laboratory tests indicated the absence of concurrent antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient discontinued follow-up visits to the ophthalmology department for 1 year. Upon re-examination, a prominent neovascular membrane and vitreous hemorrhage were observed in the right eye, whereas cotton wool spots in the left eye resolved. The patient underwent lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomies two times. In the 15-year period after the vitrectomies, no recurrence of neovascular alterations in the right eye was noted. Conclusions and importance: Although lupus retinopathy generally presents with similar severity in both eyes, the patient in this study demonstrated unilateral neovascular alterations and asymmetrical clinical progression. These findings indicate the requirement for careful monitoring of patients with asymmetrical lupus retinopathy, even in those without antiphospholipid syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.