ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Configuring green behaviors in hospitality: a drive-state-pressure model analysis of institutional and individual dynamics.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The hotel industry creates significant economic value but also intensifies environmental challenges. Frontline employees' green behaviors (EGB) are crucial for translating organizational sustainability commitments into practice. This study applies the Drive-State-Pressure (DSP) model to examine how institutional pressures and individual agency jointly shape EGB. Methods: Survey data were collected from 356 hotel employees in China. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) was used to explore configurational pathways leading to task-oriented green behavior (TGB) and voluntary green behavior (VGB). Results: Coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures promote TGB primarily through compliance, whereas VGB is driven by autonomy and normative alignment. Distinct combinations of pressures and individual states highlight the complex mechanisms underlying EGB. Discussion: The findings extend institutional theory by bridging macro- and micro-level perspectives through the DSP model and offer practical strategies for sustainability governance. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the value of fsQCA for capturing configurational interactions in employee green behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.