Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978246›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Navigating the nexus of social appearance anxiety, learning autonomy, and collaborative dynamics in L2 acquisition: insights from Chinese university L2 learners.

Weiqi Tian, Jing Liang, Yani Zhao, Mailihaba Aolan, Jingshen Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiqi Tian *College of Foreign Languages, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, China.
Jing Liang *College of Foreign Languages, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, China.
Yani Zhao *School of Languages, Literacies and Translation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Mailihaba AolanCollege of Foreign Languages, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, China.
Jingshen GeCollege of Liberal Arts, Journalism and Communication, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the interconnected roles of social appearance anxiety, learning autonomy, and collaborative learning orientation in second language acquisition (SLA) among Chinese university students. Using Dynamic Systems Theory as a supplementary theoretical lens, it provides a dynamic interaction perspective for our study. Methods: Through structural equation modeling, the research identifies the positive impact of learning autonomy and self-regulation on collaborative learning orientation and L2 proficiency though H1 was not supported. Results: We profoundly discussed this phenomenon within sociocultural context. The study advocates for pedagogical strategies that integrate real-world communication and alleviate social anxieties to enhance learning engagement. Discussion: Limitations include a cross-sectional approach, limited sampling size (N = 301), limited L2 assessment (CET-6). Prompting recommendations for broader demographic inclusion and refined measurements such as peer review for L2 oral capability etc. The findings stress the need for educational frameworks embracing both formal and informal learning contexts, underscoring autonomy's pivotal role. This research provides actionable insights for stakeholders to create supportive environments, addressing psychological barriers and emphasizing interactive learning. Ultimately, it contributes to the theoretical advancement and practical improvement of L2 education.

Indexed as

autonomycollaborative learning orientationL2 proficiencysocial appearance anxietystructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID40978246
PMCPMC12447576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.