ArticleKidney medicine2025
Association Between Cancer and Incident Acute Kidney Injury Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Population.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Association between anamorelin therapy and renal function in patients with cancer cachexia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Observational
- Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Cancer Patients: Single-Centre Real-Life Analysis of Incidence and Clinical Impact.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of cancer due to multiple factors. Our aim was to assess contemporary associations between various cancers and incident AKI among Medicare beneficiaries. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥66 years. Exposure: New cancer diagnosis. Outcomes: Incidence of AKI. Analytical Approach: Follow-up started at cancer diagnosis or on December 31, 2014, for controls and ended at the date of AKI, death, cancer in the control group, or at 5 years, whichever occurred first. Overall and site-specific associations between cancer and AKI were assessed by cause-specific Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models, adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. Results: We identified 482,016 beneficiaries with newly diagnosed cancer and the same number of matched controls. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-5.0 years) and 4.8 (IQR, 1.7-5.0 years), respectively, for cancer cases and controls. The highest 5-year risk of AKI was observed in cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter 32.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.7%-34.8%); multiple myeloma 32.6% (95% CI, 31.7%-33.4%); and kidney cancer 28.9% (95% CI, 28.2%-29.5%). The multivariable-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for AKI was significantly higher for multiple myeloma compared with controls and was significantly lower for cancers with high mortality, such as pancreatic, lung and bronchial, liver, gallbladder and biliary, or stomach cancer. Limitations: Potential misclassification from using International Classification of Diseases codes to identify cancer and AKI, residual confounding from unmeasured variables, lack of information on cancer stage and histology, and not accounting for cancer treatment including medication. Conclusions: Risks of AKI vary across cancer types. Multiple myeloma had the highest significant risk of AKI compared with controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.