Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978148›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Why online science education falls short.

Mohammed A Mostajo-Radji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed A Mostajo-RadjiGenomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Funding

Nanoparticle Tracking Analyzer (NTA) for the Center for Live Cell GenomicsRM1HG011543 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H, SALAMA, SOFIE REDA · 2021 to 2025
$12.0M
Data Resource and Administrative Coordination Center for the Scalable and Systematic Neurobiology of Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Disorder Risk Genes ConsortiumU24MH132628 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI DAVID H HAUSSLER, Tomasz Nowakowski · 2023 to 2026
$7.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG011543NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH132628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote science education has expanded rapidly, offering access to STEM learning at an unprecedented scale. Yet most online platforms prioritize content delivery through videos, simulations, and assessments, excluding the central experience of live experimentation. Without opportunities to generate data, test ideas, and engage in discovery, students miss chances to develop technical intuition, experimental reasoning, and ownership of the scientific process. This absence undermines inquiry-based learning, which builds understanding through doing rather than watching. Here, I examine how the current structure of online science education falls short, emphasizing the consequences of excluding real-time, hands-on investigation for reasoning, identity, and engagement. I highlight a growing class of cloud-connected platforms that allow students to remotely design, run, and analyze live experiments. By restoring access to real-time inquiry, these systems have been shown to improve learning outcomes and strengthen STEM identity, offering a promising direction for scalable, interactive science education that broadens participation globally.

Indexed as

Computer scienceEducationSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID40978148
PMCPMC12447902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.