Article in ZooKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Natdanai LikhitrakarnProgram of Agriculture, Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand Department of Biodiversity, General Directorate of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Environment Chiang Mai Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-317X
Sergei I GolovatchInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr. 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Russia.
Chhin SopheaDepartment of Biodiversity, General Directorate of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Environment, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Ministry of Environment Phnom Penh Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5612-7532
Ekgachai JeratthitikulAnimal Systematics and Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand Animal Systematics and Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-9548
Arthit PholyothaAnimal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-1164
Warut SiriwutAnimal Systematics and Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand Animal Systematics and Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand.
Ruttapon SrisonchaiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand Animal Systematics Research, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University Khon Kaen Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-0999
Somsak PanhaAnimal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.
Chirasak SutcharitAnimal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-9540
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Review of the millipede genus · full record | OpenQuestion