ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Bayesian estimation yields anti-Weber variability.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fast efficient coding and sensory adaptation in gain-adaptive recurrent networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Endogenous precision of the number sense.eLife · 2026Article
- Efficient numerosity estimation under limited time.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A classic result of psychophysics is that human perceptual estimates are more variable for larger magnitudes. This "Weber behavior," however, has typically not been the focus of the prominent Bayesian paradigm. Here, we examine the variability of a Bayesian observer in comparison with human subjects. In two preregistered experiments, we manipulate the prior distribution and the reward function in a numerosity-estimation task. When large numerosities are more frequent or more rewarding, the Bayesian observer exhibits an "anti-Weber behavior," in which larger magnitudes yield less variable responses. Human subjects exhibit a similar pattern, thus breaking a long-standing result of psychophysics. Nevertheless, subjects' responses are best reproduced by a logarithmic encoding of magnitudes, a proposal of Fechner often regarded as accounting for Weber behavior. We thus obtain an anti-Weber behavior together with a Fechner encoding. Our results suggest that the increasing variability may be primarily due to the skewness of natural priors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.