Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40978080›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2024

Hidden Population Estimation with Indirect Inference and Auxiliary Information.

Justin Weltz, Eric Laber, Alexander Volfovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin WeltzDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eric LaberDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alexander VolfovskyDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Design and analysis advances to improve generalizability of clinical trials for treating opioid use disorderR01DA056407 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kara Elizabeth Rudolph, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Next-generation SMARTs for Discovery and Evaluation of Sequential Cancer Therapeutic StrategiesR01CA280970 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric Benjamin Laber · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280970NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many populations defined by illegal or stigmatized behavior are difficult to sample using conventional survey methodology. Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) is a participant referral process frequently employed in this context to collect information. This sampling methodology can be modeled as a stochastic process that explores the graph of a social network, generating a partially observed subgraph between study participants. The methods currently used to impute the missing edges in this subgraph exhibit biased downstream estimation. We leverage auxiliary participant information and concepts from indirect inference to ameliorate these issues and improve estimation of the hidden population size. These advances result in smaller bias and higher precision in the estimation of the study participant arrival rate, the sample subgraph, and the population size. Lastly, we use our method to estimate the number of People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) in the Kohtla-Jarve region of Estonia.

Identifiers

PMID40978080
PMCPMC12448677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.