ArticleAJPM focus2025
Associations Between Transportation Barriers in the Context of Other Social Needs and Cancer Screening Adherence.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transportation insecurity, loneliness, and emotional support among individuals with a history of cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Socioeconomic inequities in breast and cervical cancer screening persist and may be driven by unmet social needs, such as transportation barriers. The association between transportation barriers and screening adherence, while adjusting for other social needs, remains poorly characterized. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 2023 National Health Interview Survey data was conducted from October to December 2024. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between transportation barriers and breast and cervical cancer screening adherence. Results: A total of 5,851 (survey-weighted 42.3 million) and 8,461 (survey-weighted 78.6 million) individuals were eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. In adjusted analyses, transportation barriers were associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening (AOR=0.6; 95% CI=0.5, 0.9) but no difference in the likelihood of cervical cancer screening (AOR=0.9; 95% CI=0.7, 1.1). Low income, lack of health insurance, and low levels of formal education were also associated with lower adherence for both breast and cervical cancer screening. Conclusion: After accounting for other social needs, transportation barriers are associated with lower likelihood of breast cancer screening-an inequity that may benefit from public health and healthcare interventions. Additional work is needed to understand the relationship between SES and cervical cancer screening adherence to inform future interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.