Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977993›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Advancing the Field of Deimplementation: Perspectives on Low-Value Clinical Preventive Services.

Meagan Pilar, Gerald Gartlehner, Shannon Kugley, Karen Strazza, Valerie Ng, Laurie Hinnant, Alison Banger, Shivani Reddy, Jodi Blake, Nora Mueller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Meagan PilarRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Gerald GartlehnerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Shannon KugleyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Karen StrazzaRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Valerie NgRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Laurie HinnantRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Alison BangerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Shivani ReddyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Jodi BlakeCenter for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Nora MuellerCenter for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Christiane VoisinDivision of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Leila KahwatiRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical preventive services, such as screening tests, vaccinations, and health behavior counseling provided in primary care settings, aim to prevent future disease, detect early disease, or mitigate the impact of unhealthy behaviors on future health. However, research advances have shown that some clinical preventive services do not confer benefit and may even cause harm for some populations. Experts have increasingly emphasized discontinuing low-value health services, a process known as deimplementation. This project gathered expert input on the state of deimplementation of low-value clinical preventive services. Methods: The author conducted (1) an environmental scan of current work on deimplementation, (2) key informant interviews ( Results: The environmental scan and technical experts identified no frameworks and few empiric studies specific to the deimplementation of low-value clinical preventive services. The experts advised that terminology surrounding deimplementation efforts and low-value health services be revised to better resonate with patients and families. Experts suggested refining existing health services deimplementation frameworks and recommended future research to test deimplementation strategies specific to low-value clinical preventive services. Experts also described unintended consequences of deimplementation that could increase health inequities. Finally, experts emphasized the importance of engaging patients and families in deimplementation efforts. Conclusions: These findings offer guidance for future work, including advancing methods; testing strategies specific to low-value clinical preventive services; and engaging patients, families, and communities in deimplementation efforts.

Indexed as

clinical preventive servicesDeimplementationhealth equitylow-value carepatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID40977993
PMCPMC12445723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.