ArticleAJPM focus2025
Advancing the Field of Deimplementation: Perspectives on Low-Value Clinical Preventive Services.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical preventive services, such as screening tests, vaccinations, and health behavior counseling provided in primary care settings, aim to prevent future disease, detect early disease, or mitigate the impact of unhealthy behaviors on future health. However, research advances have shown that some clinical preventive services do not confer benefit and may even cause harm for some populations. Experts have increasingly emphasized discontinuing low-value health services, a process known as deimplementation. This project gathered expert input on the state of deimplementation of low-value clinical preventive services. Methods: The author conducted (1) an environmental scan of current work on deimplementation, (2) key informant interviews ( Results: The environmental scan and technical experts identified no frameworks and few empiric studies specific to the deimplementation of low-value clinical preventive services. The experts advised that terminology surrounding deimplementation efforts and low-value health services be revised to better resonate with patients and families. Experts suggested refining existing health services deimplementation frameworks and recommended future research to test deimplementation strategies specific to low-value clinical preventive services. Experts also described unintended consequences of deimplementation that could increase health inequities. Finally, experts emphasized the importance of engaging patients and families in deimplementation efforts. Conclusions: These findings offer guidance for future work, including advancing methods; testing strategies specific to low-value clinical preventive services; and engaging patients, families, and communities in deimplementation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.