ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
Purpose-Driven Design: A Case Report of a Knowledge Mobilization Portal.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Need for Innovation: Synthesizing academic literature is a foundational skill in health professions education (HPE), enabling evidence-informed decision-making and continuous improvement. However, privileging one review type as the "gold standard" reinforces a narrow hierarchy of evidence, marginalizing alternative worldviews and synthesis approaches. Goal of Innovation: This innovation aimed to broaden understanding and legitimate use of diverse literature synthesis methods by developing an accessible knowledge mobilization portal to support learners, educators, and scholars across the HPE community. Steps Taken for Development and Implementation of Innovation: We developed Evaluation of Innovation: The platform successfully launched and has been sustained through a network of contributors. Informal feedback and web analytics suggest positive engagement, and early adopters report its utility in teaching and research contexts. The innovation's resonance stems not only from its content but from the relationships and shared purpose underlying its development. Critical Reflection on Your Process: Key catalysts included: (1) friendship as an often-overlooked motivator in academic work; (2) trust and relationships that fostered momentum; and (3) a shared vision that anchored the innovation. These relational dimensions were as critical as the technical design in ensuring uptake and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.