ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Translation, Validation and Exploration of the Chinese Version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire Among Hypertensive Patients in Healthcare Settings.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare providers' autonomy support influences patients' health behaviors. The Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ) effectively measures perceived autonomy support in healthcare settings, but its Chinese version lacks proper reliability and validity testing, hindering objective evaluations in China. Purpose: This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the HCCQ for assessing perceived autonomy support among Chinese hypertensive patients. Methods: Following the Brislin translation model, the Chinese version of the HCCQ was adapted. From September 2023 to January 2024, 375 hospitalized hypertensive patients from a Guangzhou tertiary hospital completed the adapted questionnaire. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test the structural validity; internal consistency and item-total correlations were used to assess reliability. Results: After excluding invalid questionnaires, this study finally analyzed data from 357 patients (with 105 cases used for EFA in the first stage and 252 cases used for CFA in the second stage). Consistent with the original questionnaire, the Chinese version of the HCCQ contains a total of 15 items and extracts one common factor, which explains 66.019% of the variance. According to the CFA results, the fitted model meets each goodness-of-fit index. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of the HCCQ is 0.961. Conclusion: Within the scope of this study, the Chinese version of the HCCQ demonstrates good validity and reliability in measuring the perceived autonomy support of hypertensive patients in healthcare settings, which can provide some reference for related research. To a certain extent, the Chinese version of the HCCQ can assist health professionals in assessing and guiding patients' perceived autonomy support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.