ArticleOxford open digital health2025
An exploration of the successful scale-up of the electronic community health information system in Kenya.
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Deployment of an Integrated Digital Platform (shamiriOS) for Scalable Youth Mental Health Service Delivery in Kenya: Development and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Transforming Breast Cancer Control in East Africa by Integrating Cytomorphology and Genetics Into National Policy.Cureus · 2026Article
- Financial determinants of effective hypertension and diabetes care in rural primary health facilities in Kisumu, Kenya: a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Implementation process and acceptability of the electronic community health information system among community health workers in Kenya.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare delivery is swiftly evolving, adopting digital solutions to significantly enhance efficiency and effectiveness. To improve community health service delivery and advance Universal Health Coverage in Kenya, a countrywide Electronic Community Health Information System (eCHIS) was implemented. This study investigated the approaches, enablers and barriers influencing its scale-up from pilot to national level. A qualitative evaluation of the eCHIS scale-up process was conducted, involving key informant interviews with policymakers at the Ministry of Health Kenya, implementing partners and county health teams and focus group discussions with County Health Focal Persons from selected counties at the subnational level. eCHIS has been implemented countrywide. The Ministry of Health at the national level employed a sequential approach, where a pilot informed version two, which was then deployed county by county. Counties at the subnational level, however, had autonomy to select either sequential, deploying eCHIS incrementally in one subcounty at a time, or non-sequential, deploying eCHIS in all subcounties simultaneously, methods tailored to their specific context and factors. Scale-up enablers included strong leadership, supportive policies, adequate financing and resources, partnerships, readiness assessments, stakeholder engagement, contextual adaptation, training, monitoring and evaluation of outputs, infrastructure and interoperability and centralized management. Barriers included funding and resource limitations, logistical and infrastructure challenges, communication challenges and partner capacity shortfalls. This study explored these aspects of scale-up in depth and provides insights for policymakers and implementers navigating the complex landscape of Health Information Systems scale-up. These findings can inform the development of guidelines for future HIS scale-up efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.