Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Artificial intelligence applications facilitate decision-making in cataract surgery for highly myopic patients.

Kaimeng Su, Wenwen He, Haifeng Jiang, Keke Zhang, Jiao Qi, Jiaqi Meng, Yu Du, Kaiwen Cheng, Xiaoxin Hu, Dongling Guo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kaimeng Su *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenwen He *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haifeng Jiang *Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Keke ZhangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiao QiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaqi MengEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu DuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kaiwen ChengEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxin HuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dongling GuoEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haike GuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yong WangAier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Yi LuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiangjia ZhuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts requires a high level of expertise. We, therefore, aimed to develop a preliminary artificial intelligence (AI) model for surgical decision-making in highly myopic cataracts, based on previous deep learning models. Materials and methods: We first established a highly myopic cataract decision-making AI model by integrating cataract grading and postoperative visual acuity prediction models of highly myopic eyes, which we had developed previously, with surgical decision logic. The outcomes of surgical decision-making were classified into four categories: surgery not advised, cataract surgery recommended, retinal surgery recommended, and combined cataract-retinal surgery recommended. The gold standard for surgical decision is defined as the decision jointly made by two professional ophthalmologists together (X.Z. and Y.W.). If the decision-makings regarding highly myopic cataract surgery were not fully consistent, a final judgment was made by a third expert (Y.L.). Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy of AI model's surgical decision-making against the gold standard and doctors at different levels, using both internal (107 highly myopic eyes from Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University) and external (55 highly myopic eyes from Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital) test datasets. Results: In the internal and external datasets, according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III international standards for cataract grading, 99.07% and 87.27% of automatic nuclear grading, along with 88.79% and 61.82% of automatic cortical grading, respectively, had an absolute prediction error of ≤1.0 compared with the gold standard. The mean postoperative visual acuity prediction error was 0.1560 and 0.3057 logMAR in the internal and external datasets, respectively. Finally, the consistency of the AI model's surgical decisions with the gold standard for highly myopic cataract patients in the internal and external datasets was 96.26% and 81.82%, respectively. AI demonstrated substantial agreement with the gold standard (Kappa value = 0.811 and 0.556 in the internal and external datasets, respectively). Conclusion: The AI decision-making model for highly myopic cataracts, based on two deep learning models, demonstrated good performance and may assist doctors in complex surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecataracthigh myopiamachine learningsurgical decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40977894
PMCPMC12443769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.