Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977877›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

A Prospective Study of the Impact of Lymphatic Venous Anastomosis as a Treatment for Lymphedema.

Catharine Bowman, Caroline Hircock, Siba Haykal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catharine BowmanFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Caroline HircockMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Siba HaykalInstitute of Medical Science and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymphedema is managed using conservative modalities, which are most effective in early stages. Surgical interventions, such as lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), are becoming popular as a method to augment conservative modalities. Despite a growing body of evidence demonstrating surgical effectiveness, prospective studies using validated measures and patient-reported outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of LVA. This prospective study evaluated the effect of LVA on limb volume, quality of life, and psychosocial well-being. Methods: Adults with stage 1-2 lymphedema undergoing LVA between January 2020 and December 2023 were included. All participants underwent 2 weeks of preoperative bandaging followed by lymphaticovenous anastomoses. Postoperative bandaging was administered for 6 weeks. Excess limb volume, lymphedema-specific quality of life, generalized anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), and lymphedema symptom intensity and distress were measured preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively. Qualitative semistructured interviews were also undertaken to contextualize findings. Results: Quantitative results indicated a modest reduction in percentage excess limb volume (median [interquartile range IQR], -4.40% [IQR, -12.20% to -1.50%], Conclusions: Our findings indicated modest improvements in percentage excess limb volume and overall quality of life after LVA. We therefore outlined several practice recommendations for the surgical care of lymphedema to improve surgical and postoperative management.

Identifiers

PMID40977877
PMCPMC12448159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.