Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977872›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Fair Operating Room Scheduling in Plastic Surgery.

Christoph Wallner, Flemming Puscz, Sonja Verena Schmidt, Felix Reinkemeier, Marcus Lehnhardt, Marius Drysch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph WallnerFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Flemming PusczFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sonja Verena SchmidtFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Felix ReinkemeierFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marcus LehnhardtFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marius DryschFrom the Department for Plastic and Hand Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Equitable operating room (OR) scheduling is critical for surgical training and resource usage. Traditional, hand-crafted schedules frequently perpetuate hidden biases. We present a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework, coupled with statistical fairness analysis, to optimize OR assignment while maintaining institutional constraints. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 1.5 years (July 2023 to December 2024) of weekly OR assignments from a plastic surgery service (n = 24 surgeons) was analyzed. A random forest model predicted future OR demand; feature importance was quantified with Shapley Additive Explanations. Fairness metrics (Gini, Theil, coefficient of variation, disparate-impact ratios) were computed at baseline. An HRL architecture-Proximal Policy Optimization at a group level and Deep Q-Learning at an individual level-reallocated OR days subject to slot, training, and part-time constraints. Performance was assessed by pre- and postoptimization fairness metrics, mean absolute deviation, and constraint-compliance rate. Results: Baseline scheduling was highly unequal (Gini = 10.39; variance = 1615.8). Past workload dominated prediction (94.6% importance), whereas hierarchy (3.1%) and employment status (2.3%) were minor predictors. HRL reduced the Gini to 0.22, variance to 865.4, and mean absolute deviation from 33.6 to 25.9, whereas qualitative fairness (case complexity, teaching value) remained to be evaluated prospectively and achieved 100% rule compliance. Fellows gained +50% OR exposure (88 versus 58 d), and junior residents, -14% (postgraduate year 2), while preserving the total annual OR capacity. Conclusions: The reproducible HRL framework produces data-driven, fair, and constraint-respecting OR schedules, balancing efficiency with educational equity. Multicenter prospective validation is warranted.

Identifiers

PMID40977872
PMCPMC12448174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.