ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Fair Operating Room Scheduling in Plastic Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and clinical application of an Intelligent Operating Room Scheduling System.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Equitable operating room (OR) scheduling is critical for surgical training and resource usage. Traditional, hand-crafted schedules frequently perpetuate hidden biases. We present a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework, coupled with statistical fairness analysis, to optimize OR assignment while maintaining institutional constraints. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 1.5 years (July 2023 to December 2024) of weekly OR assignments from a plastic surgery service (n = 24 surgeons) was analyzed. A random forest model predicted future OR demand; feature importance was quantified with Shapley Additive Explanations. Fairness metrics (Gini, Theil, coefficient of variation, disparate-impact ratios) were computed at baseline. An HRL architecture-Proximal Policy Optimization at a group level and Deep Q-Learning at an individual level-reallocated OR days subject to slot, training, and part-time constraints. Performance was assessed by pre- and postoptimization fairness metrics, mean absolute deviation, and constraint-compliance rate. Results: Baseline scheduling was highly unequal (Gini = 10.39; variance = 1615.8). Past workload dominated prediction (94.6% importance), whereas hierarchy (3.1%) and employment status (2.3%) were minor predictors. HRL reduced the Gini to 0.22, variance to 865.4, and mean absolute deviation from 33.6 to 25.9, whereas qualitative fairness (case complexity, teaching value) remained to be evaluated prospectively and achieved 100% rule compliance. Fellows gained +50% OR exposure (88 versus 58 d), and junior residents, -14% (postgraduate year 2), while preserving the total annual OR capacity. Conclusions: The reproducible HRL framework produces data-driven, fair, and constraint-respecting OR schedules, balancing efficiency with educational equity. Multicenter prospective validation is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.