Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977863›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2025

A randomised control trial to compare

Sajjad Mohammadzade Sarhadi, Asadollah Shakeri, Simin Sharifi

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Is it time to reconsider traditional medicine?: a commentary.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sajjad Mohammadzade SarhadiMSN, Community Nursing Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Asadollah ShakeriAssistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Simin SharifiAssistant Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers rank as the third most costly disease to health care services. The prevalence in Iran for hospitalised patients is approximately 19%. This study aimed to compare the effects of Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted with patients with pressure ulcers admitted to ICUs. The patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which received the Results: The study results revealed that both the Conclusion: Wound healing was expected in the silver nanoparticle group, whereas promising results were also observed in the

Indexed as

herbal dressingnursepainpatientpressure ulcersilver dressing

Identifiers

PMID40977863
PMCPMC12446287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.