ArticleCogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference2025
Symbolic numerical generalization through representational alignment.
Article in CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mapping between nonsymbolic quantities and symbolic numbers lays the foundation for mathematical development in children. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this crucial cognitive bridge remain unclear. Here, we investigate the computational principles governing symbolic-nonsymbolic integration using a biologically inspired neural network trained through developmentally inspired stages. Our investigation reveals that generalization from nonsymbolic to symbolic numerical processing emerges specifically when representational alignment forms between these numerical formats. Notably, this alignment appears to be stronger in cross-format comparison-based mapping compared to direct-label-based mapping. Furthermore, we demonstrate that subsequent symbolic specialization creates a representational divergence that impairs nonsymbolic performance while maintaining the ordinal structure of the mapping. These findings highlight representational alignment as a fundamental mechanism in numerical cognition and suggest that targeted cross-format comparison tasks may be particularly effective in improving mathematical learning in children with numerical processing difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40977751PMC12445152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.