ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Detection of lung allograft injury through a comprehensive multidisciplinary analysis of donor-derived cell-free DNA in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage: a real-world single center experience.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung transplantation in 2025: a narrative review of progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging potential tool for diagnosing lung graft injury. This study explored the relevance of dd-cfDNA levels in different graft injuries thoroughly characterized after a well-established multidisciplinary team approach. The usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) dd-cfDNA in complementing detection of allograft injury was also investigated. Methods: Plasma dd-cfDNA was measured by next generation sequence on 127 samples from patients visited consecutively, contemporaneously with a systematic analysis of surveillance transbronchial biopsy by LASHA template, BAL analysis and immunological monitoring. Results: Patients with immunological injury exhibited the highest plasma dd-cfDNA levels (median 2.67%), with a sensitivity of 100% while patients with non-immunological insults showed a sensitivity of 28%. The combination of BAL with plasma dd-cfDNA improved the sensitivity for detecting non-immunological injury from 28% to 71%. Random forest analysis showed that plasma dd-cfDNA >1% was among the most important variables in predicting death and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Discussion: Our data suggests that plasma dd-cfDNA is a useful tool for immunological graft injury assessment. The performance of BAL dd-cf DNA needs to be validated on larger case series. The integration of plasma dd-cfDNA with other post-transplant follow-up investigations may allow more sensitive diagnoses and appropriate graft injury management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.