Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977629›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026

Genomic Prediction Ability for Novel Profitability Traits Using Different Models in Nelore Cattle.

Letícia Silva Pereira, Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco, Guilherme Rosa, Nedenia Bonvino Stafuzza, Tiago Zanett Albertini, Minos Carvalho, Raysildo Barbosa Lobo, Elisa Peripolli, Eduardo da Costa Eifert, Fernando Baldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Letícia Silva PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-3470
Cláudio Ulhôa MagnaboscoEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Brazil.
Guilherme RosaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Nedenia Bonvino StafuzzaDepartment of Animal Science, Animal Science Institute (IZ), São Paulo's Agency for Agribusiness Technology (APTA), Sertãozinho, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago Zanett Albertini@Tech-Innovation Technology for Agriculture, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Minos Carvalho@Tech-Innovation Technology for Agriculture, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Raysildo Barbosa LoboNational Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Elisa PeripolliDepartment of Animal Science, São Paulo State University-Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo da Costa EifertEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Brazil.
Fernando BaldiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 202110267000441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy, bias and dispersion of genomic predictions for accumulated profitability (APF) and profit per kilogram of liveweight gain (PFT) in Nelore cattle using different prediction approaches. The dataset consisted of 3969 phenotypic records for each trait. The pedigree harboured information from 38,930 animals born between 1998 and 2016, including 2691 sires and 19,884 dams. A total of 2449 animals were genotyped using the Clarifide Nelore 3.0 SNP panel. Nine models for genomic prediction were evaluated: a linear animal model was applied to estimate genetic parameters and perform the genomic single-trait best linear unbiased prediction (ST_ss-default). Additionally, a two-trait (ssGBLUP TT_W450 and TT_DMI), three-trait (TTT_CAR) and multi-trait ssGBLUP (MT_ss) were tested. Finally, two models employing the weighted linear (ST_sswl1 and ST_sswl2) and non-linear (ST_sswnl1 and ST_sswnl2) single-step genomic approach (WssGBLUP) were used to predict genomic breeding values (GEBV). The ability to predict future performance was assessed by calculating the correlation between GEBV and adjusted phenotypes. The average prediction accuracy of the GEBV models ranged from 0.345 to 0.665 for PFT and from 0.425 to 0.603 for APF. The predictive capability of the MT_ss model (0.665) was significantly higher than that of the other models for PFT, except for the TTT_CAR model (0.604), which also showed an improvement in predictive performance. For APF, the MT_ss (0.561) and TT_W450 (0.556) models demonstrated improved genomic prediction accuracy compared to the other models. In general, the single trait ssGBLUP (ST_ss-default) models and the non-linear weighting approach did not enhance prediction accuracy for either trait. For the phenotypic prediction ability of PFT, the linear WssGBLUP models ST_sswl1 (0.65) and ST_sswl2 (0.70), TT_W450 (0.64) and ssGBLUP-M (0.66) demonstrated the highest prediction accuracies. Similar results were observed for the phenotypic prediction ability of APF for both models. However, the linear WssGBLUP models ST_sswl1 (0.84) and ST_sswl2 (0.94) provided higher prediction performance compared to the two-, three- and multi-trait models. The results indicate that the multi-trait model achieved better predictive ability for the novel traits PFT and APF. Multi-trait genomic selection may yield greater genetic gains than other models for these forthcoming economically important traits in breeding programmes.

Indexed as

BreedingGenomicsModels, GeneticAnimalsCattleFemaleGenomeGenotypeMalePedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidegenomic selectionmulti‐trait modelphenotypes of profitprediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID40977629
PMCPMC12887148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.