ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
MR sequence design to account for nonideal gradient performance.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MR sequence design to account for nonideal gradient performance.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMRI systems are traditionally engineered to produce close to idealized performance, enabling a simplified pulse sequence design philosophy. An example of this is control of eddy currents produced by gradient fields; usually these are compensated by pre-emphasizing demanded waveforms. This process typically happens invisibly to the pulse sequence designer, allowing them to assume achieved gradient waveforms will be as desired. Although convenient, this requires system specifications exposed to the end user to be substantially down-rated, as pre-emphasis adds an extra overhead to the waveforms. This strategy is undesirable for lower performance or resource-limited hardware. Instead, we propose an optimization-based method to design precompensated gradient waveforms that (i) explicitly respect hardware constraints and (ii) improve imaging performance by correcting k-space samples directly.
methodsGradient waveforms are numerically optimized by including a model for system imperfections. This is investigated in simulation using an exponential eddy current model, then experimentally using an empirical gradient system transfer function on a 7T MRI system.
resultsOur proposed method discovers solutions that produce negligible reconstruction errors while satisfying gradient system limits, even when classic pre-emphasis produces infeasible results. Substantial reduction in ghosting artifacts from echo-planar imaging was observed, including an average reduction of 77% in ghost amplitude in phantoms.
conclusionsThis work demonstrates numerical optimization of gradient waveforms, yielding substantially improved image quality when given a model for system imperfections. Although the method as implemented has limited flexibility, it could enable more efficient hardware use and may prove particularly important for maximizing performance of lower-cost systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.