ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Hemodynamic Monitoring of Simulated Bruxism Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Study.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Bruxism Detection: A Technical Pipeline Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Hemodynamic Monitoring of Simulated Bruxism Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep-related and neuromuscular conditions affect the daily lives of individuals as they impact physical and cognitive well-being. While not classified as a disorder, bruxism has emerged as a prevalent condition characterized by involuntary teeth grinding and jaw clenching, occurring either during sleep or wakefulness. Often left unnoticed, this unconscious behavior can contribute to severe dental damage, facial muscle fatigue, and temporomandibular joint disorders. These consequences require early detection and intervention to prevent long-term complications. Traditionally, polysomnography (PSG) is widely used for bruxism assessments as it gives insights into the multimodal physiological data, but it lacks direct spatial mapping of neural regions involved in rhythmic masticatory muscular activity (RMMA) associated with bruxism. METHODOLOGY: This research introduces functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) as a neuroimaging tool to monitor cortical activity associated with RMMA, distinguishing bruxism from other masticatory activities. The data were acquired in a controlled simulated paradigm setup from 10 subjects in three trials via a 20-channeled optode setup of fNIRS placed over the motor cortex region. A total of 12 temporal and frequency domain features were optimized by employing techniques of feature selection, feature importance, and feature reduction. Furthermore, synthetic data augmentation techniques of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique for Nominal features (SMOTEN), and Adaptive Synthetic sampling (ADASYN) were compared to five machine learning classifiers including k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF).
resultsThe kNN outperformed in detecting simulated bruxism among other mandible joint movements with an accuracy of 92%.
conclusionThe findings highlight the potential of fNIRS as a tool for identifying and distinguishing bruxism-like motor activities from other jaw movements, contributing to the timely management and detection of bruxism in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.