ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Unmatched Cell Line Collections Are Not Optimal for Identification of PARP Inhibitor Response and Drug Synergies.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the DNA damage response revealed by isogenic V79 mutant cell lines.Mutagenesis · 2026Article
- Unmatched Cell Line Collections Are Not Optimal for Identification of PARP Inhibitor Response and Drug Synergies.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PARP inhibitors show great efficacy in BRCA1/2-mutated patients, but many preclinical studies, including combination therapies, fail to translate clinically, likely due to the limitations of preclinical models. This brief report aimed to identify appropriate cell line models to investigate PARP inhibitor sensitivity and synergies. An in silico study of cell line collections was performed to assess the correlation between BRCA1/2 mutations and sensitivity to PARP inhibitor monotherapy or with platinum-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, we characterised an isogenic model containing Brca1 and Brca2 mutations and investigated treatment response. Using cell line collections, BRCA1- and BRCA2-altered cell lines were not associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Other factors, including high PARP1 expression and low-level genome alterations, showed correlation with increased sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor. Furthermore, cell line collections did not reflect the improved patient outcomes arising from combination PARP inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy. In contrast, the ID8 isogenic model, with specific Brca1 and Brca2 mutations, reflected patient tumour-like responses to PARP inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy. This study suggests exercising caution when using cell line collections as part of model selection when investigating PARP inhibitor sensitivity and synergy. Our data propose that using an isogenic preclinical model is more likely to accurately reflect patient tumour response. However, as this study was limited to a single isogenic model, further validation in additional systems will be required to broaden the scope of these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.