Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977480›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2025

Importance of measuring and reporting environmental conditions across plant science subdisciplines.

Christopher Vincent, Courtney P Leisner, Anna M Locke, Elena Pelech, Stephanie C Schmiege, Thomas D Sharkey, Mauricio Tejera-Nieves, Dorcas Olufunke Alade, Amanda A Cardoso, Ahram Cho and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christopher VincentDepartment of Horticultural Sciences and Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Alfred, FL 33850, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-1231
Courtney P LeisnerSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA 24061, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-686X
Anna M LockeUSDA-ARS Soybean & Nitrogen Fixation Research Unit, Raleigh, NC 27606, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4254-4466
Elena PelechDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-324X
Stephanie C SchmiegeBiology Department, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9054-5538
Thomas D SharkeyDepartment of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4423-3223
Mauricio Tejera-NievesJan IngenHousz Institute, Bornsesteeg 48a, 6708 PE Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1698-0501
Dorcas Olufunke AladeDepartment of Horticultural Sciences and Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Alfred, FL 33850, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7534-763X
Amanda A CardosoDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-6246
Ahram ChoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-6308
Kithmee De SilvaDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8050-5417
Nicole DziedzicDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6222-1426
Alison R GillSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-6710
Ravneet KaurSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA 24061, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3490-0416
Sarah L LaneBerry Environmental Resilience Research & Innovation (BERRI) Centre, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7M7, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-5507-2956
Gillian Zeng MichalczykDepartment of Horticultural Sciences and Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Alfred, FL 33850, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-0070-8760
Atinder SinghCarl R Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5543-9139
Demissew Tesfaye TeshomeDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-7694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding plant responses to the environment is based on research performed across several scales and subdisciplines. However, the interpretation and repeatability of experimental results depend on careful reporting of experimental procedures and environmental conditions. These conditions include light intensity and quality, temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit, soil water potential or volumetric water content, and pot size, which interact on plant physiological responses across biological and experimental scales regardless of whether they are the focus of the experiment. To ascertain how effectively and consistently these conditions are reported, we reviewed more than 200 plant science research articles on vascular plants published from 2020 through 2024. Environmental condition data were often not reported, including cases where the specific environmental variable was the focus of the study. This situation hampers both replicability and interpretability of results and hinders progress in understanding plant physiological responses across subdisciplines. The Environmental and Ecological Plant Physiology section of the American Society of Plant Biologists recommends several best practices to measure and report environmental conditions in plant physiology experiments, such as measuring and reporting actual environmental conditions, especially of control variables, to enable replication and comparative interpretation among experiments. These guidelines can aid authors in experimental design and manuscript preparation and assist reviewers in evaluating submitted manuscripts. Following such guidelines will enhance the dynamic progress of sound plant science within our community by improving replicability and enabling cross-disciplinary interpretation of results.

Indexed as

BotanyEnvironmentPlant Physiological PhenomenaResearch DesignPlants

Identifiers

PMID40977480
PMCPMC12571154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.