ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra and Canakinumab in Patients With VEXAS Syndrome: An International Multicenter Study.
Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VEXAS syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare differences in clinical response, drug survival, and adverse event rates between anakinra and canakinumab in VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome.
methodsThis multicenter international study includes patients with VEXAS from France, Israel, and Italy treated with interleukin-1 inhibition. Global response (GR) was defined as the absence of inflammatory symptoms and ≥50% decrease in steroid dose and C-reactive protein. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify associated variables. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank test, with Cox regression models for associated factors.
resultsWe included 47 male patients with VEXAS; 44 received anakinra and 9 received canakinumab, with 6 patients using both at different time points. GR at 1 month was 34% for anakinra and 100% for canakinumab (P < 0.001) and 22% and 78% at 3 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Treatment with canakinumab was associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of achieving GR at 3 months (OR 28.8, 95% confidence interval 3.0-273.9; P = 0.004) in a multivariable analysis. Median drug survival was 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-56) months for canakinumab at 300 mg/month compared with 7 (IQR 4-8) months for canakinumab 150 mg/month and 1 (IQR 1-2.5) months for anakinra (P = 0.01). Injection-site reactions were only recorded for the anakinra group (47 vs 0%; P = 0.006), whereas infections were more frequent in the anakinra group (31% and 11%; P = 0.3).
conclusionCanakinumab demonstrated superior clinical response and drug survival with fewer adverse events compared with anakinra. Monthly canakinumab 300 mg may be considered as an effective steroid-sparing therapeutic option for patients with VEXAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.