Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977401›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Late 21st-Century Climate and Land Use Driven Loss of Plant Diversity in African Mountains.

João de Deus Vidal Junior, Alexandre Antonelli, Clinton Carbutt, Vincent Ralph Clark, Tobias Fremout, Christopher Chapano, Inês Chelene, David Chuba, Tadesse Woldemariam Gole, Clayton Langa and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

João de Deus Vidal JuniorGeography Section, University of Passau, Passau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-4102
Alexandre AntonelliRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-9297
Clinton CarbuttSchool of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.
Vincent Ralph ClarkAfromontane Research Unit & Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, Phuthaditjhaba, South Africa.
Tobias FremoutAlliance Bioversity International-CIAT, Lima, Peru.
Christopher ChapanoNational Herbarium of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Inês CheleneHerbário LMA Do Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
David ChubaDepartment of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Tadesse Woldemariam GoleEnvironment and Coffee Forest Forum (ECFF), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Clayton LangaHerbário LMA Do Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
Benoit LoeuilleRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Ermias Lulekal MollaDepartment of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Timothy Richard PearceRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Andrew J PlumptreKey Biodiversity Area Secretariat, c/o BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Feyera SenbetaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana.
Carolina TovarRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8256-9174
Joseph Douglas Mandla WhiteRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Christine Brigitte SchmittGeography Section, University of Passau, Passau, Germany.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt StiftungKew DevelopmentSwedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research MISTRASwedish Research Council 2019-05191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the 1.5°C-5°C increase in global temperature projected for this century, many plant species are expected to shift their distribution ranges to track their environmental requirements. Across several mountain regions, responses to climate change like upslope shifts may result in accelerated rates of species turnover, species richness increases in upper montane belts, and amplified habitat losses. Yet, evidence of how such processes may influence plant diversity in Africa is still scarce. Here, using a species distribution modeling approach, we quantify and map how different scenarios of climatic and land-use changes may affect plant species ranges in African mountains. Using individually tuned models and dispersal buffers, we compared distribution losses and potential expansion through dispersal across 607 vascular plant species under three shared socioeconomic pathways for the end of the century. Our projections indicate that keeping warming under 2°C until 2100 under a sustainability scenario (SSP1.26), almost half (49.3%) of the species would experience a contraction in suitable areas, compared to 71%-75.6% in case these targets are not met (SSP3.70 and SSP5.85). Among these losses, mean contractions between 19% and 50.4% are predicted depending on the scenario. We project rates of upslope shifts that may be up to three times higher than the global calculated average. Contractions will be higher for species occurring at upper elevations, and trees and shrubs will show lower declines. Our findings align with previously reported trends of upslope shifts of species distributions but suggest that accelerated rates of change may limit the capacity of some species to track their niche based solely on their natural dispersal capacity. This implies that further efforts to improve habitat connectivity, restoration, and assisted migration may be necessary.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangePlant DispersalPlantsAfricaEcosystemModels, Theoreticalclimate changeconservation biologydistribution modellinghabitat lossmountain biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID40977401
PMCPMC12451491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.