Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977381›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Social function in adolescent eating disorders: lived experience framework for clinical practice.

Dasha Nicholls, Daniella Boules, Nikita Julius, Emerie Sheridan, Victoria Burmester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dasha NichollsDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-6605
Daniella BoulesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nikita JuliusDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0815-0351
Emerie SheridanDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-9548
Victoria BurmesterDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-3640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial function is increasingly demonstrated as a factor in risk, maintenance and outcome of eating disorders, but not emphasised in theoretical models of, and treatment approaches to, adolescent eating disorders.

aimsTo adapt Schmidt and Treasure's cognitive interpersonal model of anorexia nervosa to incorporate developmental and transdiagnostic components.

methodQualitative interviews with young people aged 12-16 years (inclusive), who are in contact with child and adolescent community eating disorders services, and their parents, subjected to thematic analysis.

resultsFive key themes emerged that were mutually dependent on a sixth theme of emotion regulation and coping. These themes were: peer relationships, change and uncertainty, thinking styles, appearance and achievement-based values, and family relationships.

conclusionsPeer relationships emerged as distinct from family relationships in this population, and a unifying theme was emotion regulation and coping. The framework could guide clinical assessment and the development or adaptation of interventions to address the themes identified. Research is needed to understand the role of the themes in treatment response and outcomes.

Indexed as

Anorexia nervosachild and adolescent psychiatryfeeding or eating disordersrehabilitation and social psychiatrysocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID40977381
PMCPMC12458093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.